Anyone out there interested in what it will be like to
show up for work on January 2nd, the day “sequestration” begins and
nearly $600 billion in spending cuts and revenue enhancements automatically go
into effect? Want to know what it will
be like to have to decide which bill to pay, and which stores to
buy supplies in? Need help figuring out which
services are essential and which are luxuries?
Then contact your local arts organization. They’ll tell you. They live this life pretty much every day of every
year. In good times and bad, nonprofit
arts organizations relentlessly prepare themselves for the inevitable
“doomsday” scenario in which a key donor passes away, the promised corporate
gift fails to materialize, or the storage facility with all the sets and
costumes burns down.
Extremely well-managed non-profits have developed a
two-tiered financial cushion. The first
tier is a six- to 12-month cash reserve fund that will allow them to operate at
current capacity without interruption, and will buy them time to make
additional plans for more austerity or for replenishing their coffers in due
course. The second tier is the much less
liquid endowment fund whose corpus
may, under duress, be accessed but only with a great deal of hand-wringing by
trustees, legal counsel, and parties “of interest.”
Unfortunately, when I last checked, most non-profit
cultural organizations in Vermont barely have a positive fund balance much less
a reserve account or an endowment. So with January 2nd fast approaching,
what will become of them? How will they
survive?
The short answer is they will do what they always
do. They will cut where they need to,
explore new ideas and new collaborations (within their means, of course), and
create, present, perform, exhibit, compose, and write their way towards,
inevitably, the next crisis...
But wait, you say, it’s not just the cuts that will
happen. It’s the tax increases especially on the wealthy that will result in
significantly more pain for the nonprofit sector. Who will underwrite the next production if
not the wealthy donors whose taxes are low and discretionary income is
high? If their charitable deductions are
capped, what will happen? How will we cope?
Two things: first, people who have a lot of money give to charities because they believe in the charity's mission, not because they get a tax deduction.
Second, this reminds me of a conversation I had a few years ago with
my then-eighth-grade child. “Dad, I just spoke to my friend who just finished 9th
grade math and he told me all about quadratic equations and functions and I’m
really sure I’m going to fail math next year.”
I assured him that by the time he got to this point next year his
teachers would have taught him
everything he needs to know.
Like all good teachers, life has a tendency to prepare
you for what is coming next. Whether it
is a macro-cosmic issue like global warming or a so-called fiscal cliff, or a
micro-personal issue like learning quadratic equations, life has a way of
giving us the time and resources to learn how to navigate through what seem
like insurmountable shoals and emerge into a new awareness. As far as the fiscal cliff is concerned, I
agree with Warren Buffet. Congress
will figure it all out. Maybe not by
January 1, but certainly soon thereafter.
Until then, I’m going to get out as much as I can and
enjoy the season. I have places to go,
people to meet with, hand-made, high-quality gifts to buy, and four extraordinary artists in Brattleboro to celebrate!
No comments:
Post a Comment