Once a year we have a conversation with the Governor’s
Finance Office about our Vermont state appropriation.
We fill out forms, write a defense of our programs and services, and
wait to be told—usually in December—what our “Governor’s Recommendation” will
be for the next fiscal year. From then
on, until the end of the legislative session in May, we spend our time
defending this recommendation from others who want to change it. At least that is how it usually goes.
The conversation for next fiscal year has begun and already
it is different.
We are asking for a $500,000 increase.
Our current appropriation is $507,607. It has been exactly that for four years,
which according to my colleagues in other states, is considered to be “a
success,” given the recession. However,
from another perspective, it is NOT a success.
Our appropriation has been within 5% of $500,000 (sometimes higher but
usually lower) since 1991.
In 1991 our state appropriation was $479,153. If it had simply kept pace with inflation,
our state appropriation today would be more than $810,000. By staying put at $500,000, the appropriation
has effectively reduced the Council’s capacity to serve the field more than
$300,000 in this year alone.
It’s no wonder, then, that our constituents are feeling
pinched. We have helped to develop an
arts sector that is among the finest of its type (given our population and resources),
but are supporting it with 40% fewer grant dollars and technical resources than
we had only 20 years ago.
There are several other reasons why the
Vermont Arts Council needs an increase.
The first is that the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) has
significantly tightened up its matching requirements that allow states to fulfill their part of the State Arts
Partnership Agreement (the contract that we sign on behalf of the state that
releases Federal funds to support the arts in Vermont). Thus, next year, if the
State of Vermont doesn’t match the NEA appropriation at least one-to-one, we
stand to leave a quarter of a million dollars in Federal funding “on the
table.” This would be an actual cut, the size of which would be cataclysmic to the dozens of organizations, schools, and
hundreds of artists whose projects benefit Vermont communities, educate our
children, attract tourists, support several thousand employees, and in general
improve the quality of our lives.
But since meeting the NEA match doesn’t address what we
will actually DO with the money, the second reason is all about what the money
would be used for.
In order of priority, here is what is needed:
1) A significant investment in practical (useful) ways to
approach the appalling deficit in arts education funding in Vermont. We believe that it makes little sense to talk about
“developing a creative workforce” on one hand, while focusing on STEM or “The
Common Core” (which at best ignore arts education programs) on the
other. The arts allow students to learn
how to explore their own creative instincts in a structured, sequential, and
collaborative way. If the 21st century expects schools to churn out
“creative workers” we have some serious catching up to do. To start with, we will conduct a “status
inventory” of learning in and through the arts in our preK-12 public school
system. This hasn’t been done for at
least five years, and we have to find out what best practices are enabling some
schools to thrive while others are abandoning the arts.
2) Related to this effort, we have to ensure that as many
community arts organizations as possible are providing supplemental arts
education activities to citizens in the communities they serve. Starting with in-school and after-school arts
programs and experiences, and continuing on with adult, senior, and underserved
populations, community arts organizations frequently are considered the “glue”
that holds a community together. Again, a
statewide inventory of “who is doing what” is an important starting point—an
activity that has never been done.
3) Supplemental marketing and promotion for the arts
sector. In 2010 a
study commissioned by Main Street Landing revealed that in 2008 artists,
nonprofit arts organizations and their combined creative output resulted in
nearly $19.5 million in state and local tax revenues. It revealed a sector that employs nearly 6,400
Vermonters and accounts for a significant portion (as much as 10%) of total
tourism-generated revenues. What the study does
not reveal is that this revenue is the “return” on a combined state and local
investment of less than $3 million!
Anyone attending the Discover Jazz Festival, Music at
Marlboro, the Made in Vermont tour, or visiting any of our dozens of visual
arts attractions (from historic sites to museums and galleries), and “classic”
19th century opera houses and town hall theaters from Derby Line to
Wilmington, is familiar with the role that art and culture plays in the Vermont
landscape. What is exciting is how art
and food culture is blending to turn farmers markets, harvest festivals, weekend
farm stays, and ski vacations into true multicultural experiences. The challenge is that so much is known about
Vermont’s winter outdoor recreation, artisanal food production (especially
cheese!), maple products, our famous fall foliage, and our growing
reputation for micro-brews and niche wines, that carving out “bandwidth” to
showcase the arts is getting harder and harder.
As the Vermont Arts Council starts the countdown on 50
years of public arts funding in Vermont, we believe there is a critical window
of opportunity to showcase Vermont as being, among many other great things, an
Amazing Arts Destination! Not to sound
like a broken record, but conducting an inventory of our cultural assets, county
by county, town by town, is the first task that needs to occur. Then organizing this information into a web-
or app-based service that will allow residents and visitors to explore our
dynamic state will become, finally, a reality.
Two of these priorities focus on preparing Vermont’s most
vital cultural asset—our children—for survival in an increasingly competitive
future. The third priority focuses on responsibly
developing a resource to attract and retain visitors and residents alike for
years to come. The first two priorities
represent an opportunity to show how good government programs serve the
people. The third represents how
government can, with a very small investment, develop huge returns for itself
and local municipalities across the state.
So…here’s where YOU come in!
We have about 10 more days to let Governor Peter Shumlin
and Administration Secretary Jeb Spaulding know how important this investment
is to Vermont. Please take a few minutes
now to contact them and share your view about the need to support the Council’s
request for increased funding.
It is VITAL that the budget the Governor presents to the
Legislature in January includes a significant increase for our next fiscal year
(starting in July 2013).
I’ve provided you with a couple of key talking points,
but to recap:
We need your help in asking the Governor to increase the
Vermont Arts Council’s state appropriation to $1,007,507 (a $500,000 increase
over the current level). Doing so will
· Allow us to match the NEA’s federal grant of
$750,000
· Invest resources in Vermont’s Creative Workforce
by ensuring adequate access to arts instruction in our preK-12 schools
throughout Vermont
· Invest in our communities’ quality of life by
ensuring adequate resources are available to the statewide network of cultural
institutions that collaborate locally to improve economic opportunity and
cultural/educational services to all populations
· Invest in marketing and promotional campaigns
that feature arts festivals, cultural attractions, and performance venues whose
combined activity have significant tourist “ROI” for every dollar spent.
The Governor may be reached by contacting 802-828-3333.
Secretary Spaulding may be reached by calling
802-828-3322.
Governor Shumlin may be contacted here.
Secretary Spaulding may be contacted here. (click on his link)
Both of them may be reached by snail mail at
109 State Street
Montpelier, VT
05609
A phone call is better than a letter. A letter is as good as a personalized
email. A “form” email (in which you
simply cut and paste the above talking points) is better than nothing.
Have fun and thank you for helping us turn Vermont into
THE State of the Arts!
p.s. In case
anyone asks, the Council has no expectation of increasing its staff beyond its
current level. Any increase to our
appropriation resulting from this effort will be committed to the three areas
described above.
Please feel free to subscribe to my blog by clicking in the box below my picture in the upper right corner of the page. And thanks to Vermont Arts Council's ArtMail for serving as a great bully pulpit!
No comments:
Post a Comment